The Operator wrote:
> "THE NFLGURU" <hold@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:l5mdnT5ag-tIB-7YnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "GoMavsGo" <mavz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:y5Mch.2907$QC.2564@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> <i_tell_it_like_it_is_1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> news:1165196152.419486.317370@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> GoMavsGo wrote:
> >>>> Too bad. I wanted to see Michigan...
> >>>
> >>> michigan already had their shot, and proved they are not worthy. go
> >>> gators!
> >>
> >>
> >> i dont think a 3 point loss quialifies as a chance and a last
chance.. it
> >> was close enough that there should be one more shot...
> >
> > and you are a clueless idiot.
>
> OSU is the #1 team. At this point it shuldn't matter who they beat
during
> the season and who lost to them. The team to play them should be the
one at
> the top of the list when all numbers and factors are put in the computer
and
> ranked - although we all now how that works. The teams should be ranked
> based on what rank they are for each game and what rank the team that
they
> played is ranked. So if your schedule has several of the top teams
during
> the season - you should get more points. UM may come out on top of that
> list - they may not - but there is no human way to decipher all of this
> without playoffs like every other s****t in college and pro. It would
more
> than likely extend the season a week or two - but they could start
earlier.
looks like it is time to roll the NCAA football schedule back to 10
regular season games. that was a good level of play - 10 games. but
no, greed took over, and now they play 12 regular season games. taking
those boys away from their cl***** and books. then and ONLY then,
could it be considered to have a playoff. And only of the top 4 ranked
teams, no more!
