"Diggler" <dnarmstrong@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:fdaadffb-a3c1-4a92-bda8-8217e5a129a7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> Undoubtedly he thought he was about to touch the rope - he
definitely
>> >> let
>> >> go
>> >> of the ball deliberately rather than having it fall from his grasp.
>> >> However
>> >> the Law is quite clear on this matter: being in control of the ball
is
>> >> not
>> >> enough - he must also be in control of his own movements.
>>
>> > Not sure which body movement you're saying he wasn't in control of..
>>
>> The momentum which caused him to think he was going to fall over the
>> rope.
>> You don't move towards the boundary in that situation because you think
>> it's
>> a good idea.
>>
>> Andrew
>
> Not sure it'd be interpreted that way every time by every umpire.
> Plenty of catches have been taken with the catcher not being on
> control of their momentum. Some would argue that he was in fact in
> control, but didn't realise it. Without being unsure of where he was
> he still would have been in control of the catch.
Diggler alias Rodney Ulyate,
Lord Jesus will punish you for your sins of raping young boys and girls
between the ages of 12-18 in Kenya.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.s****t.cricket/msg/63401407defd4a8e
May Lord Jesus bless you to burn in hell Diggler alias Rodney Ulyate.
