"Don't Taze Me, Bro!" <NoOne184@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:mSNYj.3294$dh.1001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Jefferson N. Glapski" <jeffersonWEARE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> message news:rBNYj.283049$pM4.254378@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> It was overturned after the season
>
> I agree. It was over turned after the season and for good reason.
Because
> it was a ridiculous rule. Good call!
> The rule you speak of came to the league in 1997 and was highly
> controversial, and then removed 2 years later.
>
>>> Furthermore, Hasek called the goal fair and said Hull had him beat.
>>
>> No he didn't.
>
> Yes, he did! He said it was a fair goal and there was no
controvreversey.
Cite it then.
He actually said:
"It's disappointing. We fight hard for two or three extra months and
worked
so hard. We tried to do everything. Just because somebody upstairs didn't
care, the season finished a little early." - Dominik Hasek, Buffalo Sabres
Goaltender
>> Interestingly, players can still put themselves offside.
>
> Bryan Lewis's thoughts count more than yours. Sorry!
Not really. Nobody believes Lewis. The majority of people know it was no
goal. The other people, who live in places where hockey is not understood,
either have no ****ing clue or know it wasn't a goal, but dishonestly
pretend it was. So are you clueless or dishonest?
>> Hence it was silly to compare a 1998-1999 season game under 1999-2000
>> rules. I'm glad you now understand how ****ing stupid you were.
>
> The rule you speak of came to the league in 1997 and was highly
> controversial, and then removed 2 years later.Therefore it is nothing
like
> your other examples, ****tard.
>
> With that said, don't fret. Hull won Hasek a Stanley Cup 2 years later.
Let me quote from the same source you did, ****:
"Throughout the season, goals very similar to Hull's had been disallowed.
Considering all the evidence, I conclude that the league blew the call and
then scrambled like hell to cover its ass."
|
