Re: Treadmill advice needed

On 2008-07-08, Steve Freides <steve@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> You miss the point entirely.  No one says kettlebells are better or 
> worse.  Read my reply again - 

Your "reply" was a non-sequiter that completely ignored the OP's question 
which was about buying treadmills and instead consisted of unsolicited
advice
about training methods.

This is a consistent pattern in your posts. You are not responsive to 
questions posed.  At best this reflects an egocentric world view, and as
such
it is seen as heavy handed or even a bit rude.

> it begins with the words "my choice would 
> be" 

What your "choice would be" is neither responsive nor relevant to the OP's

question.

> and I assume the original poster doesn't need your help to figure 
> out that he/she may have a different opinion.  I shared mine 

Which was not responsive to OP's question. 

The OP was not asking for a critique of his/her approach to training, or
soliciting novel training methods.

> and I'm not 
> bashful about doing that.  That you seem to feel my opinion carries the 
> weight of some religious dictum is your problem, I'm afraid.

The fact that you "respond" to the OP's question with a request or at the
very
least, an invitation to abandon their approach and instead come around to
your 
way of thinking creates the impression that you are here to proselytize
rather
than to help. 

Cheers,
-- 
Elflord