Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Sports Network > Back country > Re: Pseudo-envi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 4 Topic 6109 of 6424
Post > Topic >>

Re: Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions.

by Siskuwihane <Siskuwihane1@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 31, 2008 at 04:32 PM

On Jul 31, 5:57=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:06:52 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Jul 31, 10:55=A0am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:17:46 GMT, "M. Halliwell"
>
> >> <templetagteam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >Mike Vandeman wrote:
>
> >> >>>>> Oh, so now you are claiming, because you have "studied" that
you=
 are an
> >> >>>>> engineer, agrologist, forester, biologist and so forth. I'm
sure=
 the
> >> >>>>> regulating bodies in California would love to hear that (don't
p=
roclaim
> >> >>>>> it too loudly, Mike).
> >> >>>> Yes. *****sing mountain biking impacts doesn't require any
> >> >>>> credentials. What are your qualifications in conservation
biology=
?
>
> >> >>> Your claim of being an engineer is noted. Please be advised that
> >> >>> engineering is a regulated field and claiming such without
adequat=
e
> >> >>> qualifications and certification can open you to censure by the
st=
ate
> >> >>> regulating body.
>
> >> >> BS. Show me where I claimed to be an engineer.
>
> >> >First thing I said Mike: "Oh, so now you are claiming, because you
ha=
ve
> >> >"studied" that you are an engineer, agrologist, forester, biologist
a=
nd
> >> >so forth."...your first answer: "Yes."
>
> >> >Perhaps you need to be a little more clear with your use of the
engli=
sh
> >> >language?
>
> >> NO. It's obvious that I didn't mean a professional. You twisted my
> >> statement to mean that. But what else could we expect from a MOUNTAIN
> >> BIKER?????
>
> >Michael J. Vandeman is an armchair environmentalist. He does no actual
> >hands-on research himself so his "findings" are bogus.
>
> So a "review of the literature" isn't science? That would come a big
> news to all scientists.

No more than a review of the new Batman movie. Your "reviews" are on
par with Roger Ebert, nothing more than opinion.


> =A0He has been
>
> >proven wrong hundreds of times.
>
> BS. Not by any real SCIENTIST. None of the SCIENTISTS who have heard
> me speak have found anything wrong with my papers on mountain biking.

I'm sure your papers were just fine for whiping ***** when they
restroom was out of toilet paper, but in the real world, ALL your
claims have been refuted and proven false by REAL research. Deal with
it.
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Re: Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions
Siskuwihane <Siskuwiha  2008-07-31 16:32:04 
Re: Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions
Mike Vandeman <mjvande  2008-08-01 22:30:28 
Re: Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions
Siskuwihane <Siskuwiha  2008-08-03 06:34:53 
Re: Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions
Mike Vandeman <mjvande  2008-08-03 09:39:01 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 19:56:45 CST 2008.