On Aug 2, 1:51=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:45:49 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Aug 2, 1:30=A0am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:32:04 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
> >> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >On Jul 31, 5:57=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:06:52 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
> >> >> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >On Jul 31, 10:55=A0am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:17:46 GMT, "M. Halliwell"
>
> >> >> >> <templetagteam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >Mike Vandeman wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >>>>> Oh, so now you are claiming, because you have "studied"
th=
at you are an
> >> >> >> >>>>> engineer, agrologist, forester, biologist and so forth.
I'=
m sure the
> >> >> >> >>>>> regulating bodies in California would love to hear that
(d=
on't proclaim
> >> >> >> >>>>> it too loudly, Mike).
> >> >> >> >>>> Yes. *****sing mountain biking impacts doesn't require any
> >> >> >> >>>> credentials. What are your qualifications in conservation
b=
iology?
>
> >> >> >> >>> Your claim of being an engineer is noted. Please be advised
=
that
> >> >> >> >>> engineering is a regulated field and claiming such without
a=
dequate
> >> >> >> >>> qualifications and certification can open you to censure by
=
the state
> >> >> >> >>> regulating body.
>
> >> >> >> >> BS. Show me where I claimed to be an engineer.
>
> >> >> >> >First thing I said Mike: "Oh, so now you are claiming, because
=
you have
> >> >> >> >"studied" that you are an engineer, agrologist, forester,
biolo=
gist and
> >> >> >> >so forth."...your first answer: "Yes."
>
> >> >> >> >Perhaps you need to be a little more clear with your use of
the=
english
> >> >> >> >language?
>
> >> >> >> NO. It's obvious that I didn't mean a professional. You twisted
=
my
> >> >> >> statement to mean that. But what else could we expect from a
MOU=
NTAIN
> >> >> >> BIKER?????
>
> >> >> >Michael J. Vandeman is an armchair environmentalist. He does no
ac=
tual
> >> >> >hands-on research himself so his "findings" are bogus.
>
> >> >> So a "review of the literature" isn't science? That would come a
bi=
g
> >> >> news to all scientists.
>
> >> >No more than a review of the new Batman movie. Your "reviews" are on
> >> >par with Roger Ebert, nothing more than opinion.
>
> >> >> =A0He has been
>
> >> >> >proven wrong hundreds of times.
>
> >> >> BS. Not by any real SCIENTIST. None of the SCIENTISTS who have
hear=
d
> >> >> me speak have found anything wrong with my papers on mountain
bikin=
g.
>
> >> >I'm sure your papers were just fine for whiping ***** when they
> >> >restroom was out of toilet paper, but in the real world, ALL your
> >> >claims have been refuted and proven false by REAL research.
>
> >> How would YOU know? You can't even SPELL, much less judge scientific
> >> quality.
>
> >My misspelling of the word "wiping" doesn't negate your lack of
> >qualifications, but you "probaby" knew that.
>
> >Sorry that your claims about mountain-bikng were debunked by real
> >researchers,
>
> LIAR. Name even ONE "real researcher" who has "debunked" my claims. I
> know you can't. You are nothing but hot air.
Wilson and Seney debunked you years ago. You tried to refute their
findings with opinion but you never did anything real to back it up,
as usual. Your keyboard research is a farce.
|
