On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 15:57:23 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
<Siskuwihane1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Aug 2, 6:25 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:29:00 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >On Aug 2, 1:51 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:45:49 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>>
>> >> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >On Aug 2, 1:30 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:32:04 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>>
>> >> >> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> >On Jul 31, 5:57 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:06:52 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>>
>> >> >> >> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >On Jul 31, 10:55 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:17:46 GMT, "M. Halliwell"
>>
>> >> >> >> >> <templetagteam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >Mike Vandeman wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Oh, so now you are claiming, because you have
"studied" that you are an
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> engineer, agrologist, forester, biologist and so
forth. I'm sure the
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> regulating bodies in California would love to hear
that (don't proclaim
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> it too loudly, Mike).
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Yes. *****sing mountain biking impacts doesn't require
any
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> credentials. What are your qualifications in
conservation biology?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Your claim of being an engineer is noted. Please be
advised that
>> >> >> >> >> >>> engineering is a regulated field and claiming such
without adequate
>> >> >> >> >> >>> qualifications and certification can open you to
censure by the state
>> >> >> >> >> >>> regulating body.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> BS. Show me where I claimed to be an engineer.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >First thing I said Mike: "Oh, so now you are claiming,
because you have
>> >> >> >> >> >"studied" that you are an engineer, agrologist, forester,
biologist and
>> >> >> >> >> >so forth."...your first answer: "Yes."
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >Perhaps you need to be a little more clear with your use
of the english
>> >> >> >> >> >language?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> NO. It's obvious that I didn't mean a professional. You
twisted my
>> >> >> >> >> statement to mean that. But what else could we expect from
a MOUNTAIN
>> >> >> >> >> BIKER?????
>>
>> >> >> >> >Michael J. Vandeman is an armchair environmentalist. He does
no actual
>> >> >> >> >hands-on research himself so his "findings" are bogus.
>>
>> >> >> >> So a "review of the literature" isn't science? That would come
a big
>> >> >> >> news to all scientists.
>>
>> >> >> >No more than a review of the new Batman movie. Your "reviews"
are on
>> >> >> >par with Roger Ebert, nothing more than opinion.
>>
>> >> >> >> He has been
>>
>> >> >> >> >proven wrong hundreds of times.
>>
>> >> >> >> BS. Not by any real SCIENTIST. None of the SCIENTISTS who have
heard
>> >> >> >> me speak have found anything wrong with my papers on mountain
biking.
>>
>> >> >> >I'm sure your papers were just fine for whiping ***** when they
>> >> >> >restroom was out of toilet paper, but in the real world, ALL
your
>> >> >> >claims have been refuted and proven false by REAL research.
>>
>> >> >> How would YOU know? You can't even SPELL, much less judge
scientific
>> >> >> quality.
>>
>> >> >My misspelling of the word "wiping" doesn't negate your lack of
>> >> >qualifications, but you "probaby" knew that.
>>
>> >> >Sorry that your claims about mountain-bikng were debunked by real
>> >> >researchers,
>>
>> >> LIAR. Name even ONE "real researcher" who has "debunked" my claims.
I
>> >> know you can't. You are nothing but hot air.
>>
>> >Wilson and Seney debunked you years ago.
>>
>> That's an OBVIOUS LIE! Their article was published before mine! Their
>> so-called "erosion study" was pure hokum, and they have NEVER
>> responded to my critique or email -- obviously because I'm RIGHT! And
>> NOT ONE of the SCIENTISTS who have heard or received my paper has ever
>> found anythng wrong with it. You are full of it. I notice that you
>> didn't respond, when I asked you to state your qualifications --
>> because you don't HAVE any!
Answer the question.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are
fond of!
http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
|
