On Aug 2, 11:02=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 15:57:23 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Aug 2, 6:25=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:29:00 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
> >> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >On Aug 2, 1:51=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:45:49 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
> >> >> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >On Aug 2, 1:30=A0am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:32:04 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
> >> >> >> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >On Jul 31, 5:57=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote=
:
> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:06:52 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
> >> >> >> >> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >On Jul 31, 10:55=A0am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
w=
rote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:17:46 GMT, "M. Halliwell"
>
> >> >> >> >> >> <templetagteam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >Mike Vandeman wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Oh, so now you are claiming, because you have
"studi=
ed" that you are an
> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> engineer, agrologist, forester, biologist and so
for=
th. I'm sure the
> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> regulating bodies in California would love to hear
t=
hat (don't proclaim
> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> it too loudly, Mike).
> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Yes. *****sing mountain biking impacts doesn't
requir=
e any
> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> credentials. What are your qualifications in
conserva=
tion biology?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Your claim of being an engineer is noted. Please be
ad=
vised that
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> engineering is a regulated field and claiming such
wit=
hout adequate
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> qualifications and certification can open you to
censu=
re by the state
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> regulating body.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> BS. Show me where I claimed to be an engineer.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >First thing I said Mike: "Oh, so now you are claiming,
be=
cause you have
> >> >> >> >> >> >"studied" that you are an engineer, agrologist,
forester,=
biologist and
> >> >> >> >> >> >so forth."...your first answer: "Yes."
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >Perhaps you need to be a little more clear with your use
=
of the english
> >> >> >> >> >> >language?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> NO. It's obvious that I didn't mean a professional. You
tw=
isted my
> >> >> >> >> >> statement to mean that. But what else could we expect
from=
a MOUNTAIN
> >> >> >> >> >> BIKER?????
>
> >> >> >> >> >Michael J. Vandeman is an armchair environmentalist. He
does=
no actual
> >> >> >> >> >hands-on research himself so his "findings" are bogus.
>
> >> >> >> >> So a "review of the literature" isn't science? That would
com=
e a big
> >> >> >> >> news to all scientists.
>
> >> >> >> >No more than a review of the new Batman movie. Your "reviews"
a=
re on
> >> >> >> >par with Roger Ebert, nothing more than opinion.
>
> >> >> >> >> =A0He has been
>
> >> >> >> >> >proven wrong hundreds of times.
>
> >> >> >> >> BS. Not by any real SCIENTIST. None of the SCIENTISTS who
hav=
e heard
> >> >> >> >> me speak have found anything wrong with my papers on
mountain=
biking.
>
> >> >> >> >I'm sure your papers were just fine for whiping ***** when
they
> >> >> >> >restroom was out of toilet paper, but in the real world, ALL
yo=
ur
> >> >> >> >claims have been refuted and proven false by REAL research.
>
> >> >> >> How would YOU know? You can't even SPELL, much less judge
scient=
ific
> >> >> >> quality.
>
> >> >> >My misspelling of the word "wiping" doesn't negate your lack of
> >> >> >qualifications, but you "probaby" knew that.
>
> >> >> >Sorry that your claims about mountain-bikng were debunked by real
> >> >> >researchers,
>
> >> >> LIAR. Name even ONE "real researcher" who has "debunked" my
claims.=
I
> >> >> know you can't. You are nothing but hot air.
>
> >> >Wilson and Seney debunked you years ago.
>
> >> That's an OBVIOUS LIE! Their article was published before mine! Their
> >> so-called "erosion study" was pure hokum, and they have NEVER
> >> responded to my critique or email -- obviously because I'm RIGHT! And
> >> NOT ONE of the SCIENTISTS who have heard or received my paper has
ever
> >> found anythng wrong with it. You are full of it. I notice that you
> >> didn't respond, when I asked you to state your qualifications --
> >> because you don't HAVE any!
>
> Answer the question.
Why do you fly on commercial airlines?
|
