"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:vfk4a4t8dv9oqbfb93hj2p1giltuoqngtf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:37:07 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
> <crwlr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:0p12a49vndb3nkjqnig03185ah9fn74cvu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:14:31 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
>>> <crwlr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:40fu9454r5na0sli434b1416rrvevp52ar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:40:28 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
>>>>> <crwlr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Mike picks and chooses the literature that fits his selfish agenda
and
>>>>>>posts
>>>>>>it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar. I reviewed EVERY experimental study, 7 of 8 of which CLAIMED
>>>>> (dishonestly) that mountain biking is no more harmful than hiking.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>There is ample evidence that you are dishonest. We all agree that you
>>>>are
>>>>devoted to your cause, and that relative to your cause you mean well.
>>>>But,
>>>>you lie and cheat and misstate irrelevent facts so often that you are
>>>>seen
>>>>as utterly dishonest.
>>>
>>> You haven't found a single lie yet, LIAR.
>>>
>>
>>Misstatement of fact is a lie.
>
> No, it isn't. There must be an intent to deceive.
>
Exactly. You decieve. It is part of your agenda. What bothers me is that
you
are deceptive about the goal of preserving less than 0.0004% of the
environment. If you set about to lie about saving 4%, I could understand
the
effort.
> Applying a fact of one locale to a completely
>>different locale and asserting the same result, is a lie. Sometimes you
>>create the lie, other times you merely repeat it. But, no matter the
>>source,
>>it's still a lie.
>>
>>You do this almost daily, and sometimes more than once in the same day.
>
> You make no sense whatsoever. As usual. You need to be specific (yes,
> I know, you can't).
I can't be sepecific. You lie about everything.
|
