"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:qbo0b4hdegq6a4vtldj693rtrpvcj35ka5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> It's actually pretty obvious.
>
> Mike
>
>
> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Kevin Stewart <aspenparkland@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Subject: Even the most sensitive tourism might be bad for wildlife
>
> http://www.wildlifeextra.com/go/news/wildlife-tourism.html
>
> Even the most sensitive tourism might be bad for wildlife
>
> A new re****t, written by Sarah E. Reed & Adina M. Merenlender of the
> Department of Environmental Science, Policy & Management, University
> of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, suggests that even the most
> sensitive forms of tourism might be bad for wildlife.
>
The first paragraph says it all, "University of California, Berkeley,
CA,"
The world center of kooks and misfits.
|
