Talk About Network

Google





Sports Network > Boating Discussion Forum > For Dr. Eisboch...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 14 Topic 24457 of 25024
Post > Topic >>

For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting

by Boater <payer33859@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 15, 2008 at 07:48 AM

moneybox
The Subprime Good Guys
These mortgage lenders loan to poor people, strengthen communities, and 
are still making a profit. How do they do it?
By Daniel Gross
Posted Saturday, Nov. 15, 2008, at 7:42 AM ET

In recent months, conservative economists and editorialists have tried 
to pin the blame for the international financial mess on subprime 
lending and subprime borrowers. If bureaucrats and social activists 
hadn't pressured firms to lend to the working poor, the story goes, we'd 
still be partying like it was 2005 and Bear Stearns would be a going 
concern. The Wall Street Journal's editorial page has repeatedly heaped 
blame on the Community Reinvestment Act, the 1977 law aimed at 
preventing redlining in minority neighborhoods. Fox Business Network 
anchor Neil Cavuto in September proclaimed that "loaning to minorities 
and risky folks is a disaster."

This line of reasoning is absurd for several reasons. Many of the 
biggest subprime lenders weren't banks and thus weren't covered by the 
CRA. Nobody forced Bear Stearns to borrow $33 for every $1 of assets it 
had, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac didn't coerce highly compensated 
CEOs into rolling out no-money-down, exploding adjustable-rate 
mortgages. Banks will lose just as much money lending to really rich 
white guys like former Lehman Bros. CEO Richard Fuld as they will 
lending to poor people of color in the South Bronx.

But the best refutation may come from Douglas Bystry, president and CEO 
of Clearinghouse CDFI (community-development financial institution). 
Since 2003, this for-profit firm based in Orange County—home to busted 
subprime behemoths such as Ameriquest—has issued $220 million worth of 
mortgages in the Golden State's subprime killing fields. More than 90 
percent of its home loans have gone to first-time buyers, about half of 
whom are minorities. Out of 770 single-family loans it has made, how 
many foreclosures have there been? "As far as we know," says Bystry, 
"seven." Last year Clearinghouse re****ted a $1.4 million pretax profit.

Community-development banks, credit unions, and other CDFIs—a mixture of 
faith-based and secular, for-profit and not-for-profit 
organizations—constitute what might be called the "ethical subprime 
lending" industry. Even amid the worst housing crisis since the 1930s, 
many of these institutions s****t healthy payback rates. They haven't 
bankrupted their customers or their shareholders. Nor have they rushed 
to Wa****ngton begging for bailouts. Their numbers include tiny startups 
and veterans such as Chicago's ShoreBank, founded in 1973, which now has 
$2.3 billion in assets, 418 employees, and branches in Detroit and 
Cleveland. Cliff Rosenthal, CEO of the National Federation of Community 
Development Credit Unions, notes that for his organization's 200 
members, which serve predominantly low-income communities, "delinquent 
loans are about 3.1 percent of assets." In the second quarter, by 
contrast, the national delinquency rate on subprime loans was 18.7
percent.

Participants in this "op****tunity finance" field, as it is called, 
aren't squishy social workers. In order to keep their doors open, they 
have to charge appropriate rates—slightly higher than those on prime, 
conforming loans—and manage risk properly. They judge their results on 
financial performance and on the impact they have on the communities 
they serve. "We have to be profitable, just not profit-maximizing," says 
Mark Pinsky, president and CEO of the Op****tunity Finance Network, an 
umbrella group for CDFIs that in 2007 collectively lent $2.1 billion 
with charge-offs of less than 0.75 percent.

What sets the "good" subprime lenders apart is that they never bought 
into all the perverse incentives and "innovations" of the bad subprime 
lending system—the fees paid to mortgage brokers, the fancy offices, and 
the reliance on securitization. Like a bunch of present-day George 
Baileys, ethical subprime lenders evaluate applications carefully, don't 
pay brokers big fees to rope customers into high-interest loans, and 
mostly hold onto the loans they make rather than reselling them. They 
focus less on quantity than on quality. Clearinghouse's borrowers must 
qualify for the fixed-rate mortgages they take out. "If one of our 
employees pushed someone into a house they couldn't afford, they would 
be fired," says CEO Douglas Bystry.

These lenders put into practice the types of bromides that 
financial-services companies like to use in their advertising. "We're in 
business to improve people's lives and do asset building," says Linda 
Levy, CEO of the Lower East Side People's Federal Credit Union. The 
7,500-member nonprofit, based on New York's still-scruffy Avenue B, 
doesn't serve the gentrified part of Manhattan's Lower East Side, with 
its precious boutiques and million-dollar lofts. The average balance in 
its savings accounts is $1,400. The typical member? "A Hispanic woman 
from either Puerto Rico or the Dominican Republic in her late 40s or 
early 50s, on government assistance, with a bunch of kids," Levy says. 
Sure sounds like subprime. But the delinquency rate on its ****tfolio of 
mortgage and consumer loans is 2.3 percent, and it's never had a 
foreclosure.

Ethical subprime lenders have to look beyond credit scores and 
algorithms when making lending judgments. Homewise, based in Santa Fe, 
N.M., which lends to first-time, working-class home buyers, makes credit 
decisions based in part on whether borrowers have scraped together a 2 
percent down payment. "If customers build a savings habit to save that 
money on a modest income, it says a lot about them and their financial 
discipline," says executive director Mike Loftin. Of the 500 loans on 
Homewise's books in September, only 0.6 percent were 90 days late. That 
compares with 2.35 percent of all prime mortgages nationwide.

Since ethical subprime lenders know they're going to live with the loans 
they make—rather than simply sell them—they invest in initiatives that 
will make it more likely the loans will be paid back. Faith Community 
United Credit Union, which got started in the basement of a Baptist 
church in Cleveland in 1952 with members saving quarters on Sundays, now 
has $10 million in assets. In addition to making loans, "we teach people 
how to manage their finances and accounts," says CEO Rita Haynes. 
ShoreBank, as part of its energy-conservation loan program, offers free 
energy audits and a free Energy Star refrigerator when upgrades are 
completed. The theory, reducing energy bills makes it more likely people 
will stay current with their mortgages. Today, only $4.83 million of 
ShoreBank's $1.5 billion loans are in foreclosure, or just 0.32 percent.

Ethical subprime lenders are now expanding beyond mortgages. Ed Jacob, 
manager and CEO of Chicago's North Side Community Federal Credit Union, 
was alarmed to learn that many of his 2,700 members, most of whom have 
less than $100 in their accounts, were relying on the "second-tier 
financial-service marketplace": check-ca****ng outlets and payday 
lenders, which charge exorbitant fees. So he rolled out a Payday 
Alternative Loan, $500 for six months at 16.5 percent. The delinquency 
rate on the more than 5,000 PALs extended thus far is 2.5 percent. "For 
payday lenders, it's a success if customers keep taking out loans. To 
me, it's a success if they don't have to anymore," Jacob says. He 
believes such loans can build a credit history and help "move people to 
better products for them and us—auto loans and, eventually, mortgage
loans."

**********Lending small amounts of money carefully and responsibly to 
working-class people isn't a recipe for riches or grand executive 
living. At the headquarters of ShoreBank, which occupies a former movie 
theater built in 1923, the window in one founder's office looks out onto 
a brick wall. Bystry, the CEO of Clearinghouse CDFI, earns a salary of 
$190,000—a pittance compared with the compensation of larger lenders. 
(Angelo Mozilo, former CEO of Countrywide Financial, was paid $22.1 
million in 2007.) For all the growth, this remains very much a niche 
industry.**********

Still, the mortgage crisis has provided an op****tunity for ethical 
subprime lenders to expand. ShoreBank has added staffers and in August 
2007 rolled out a Rescue Loan program, which aims to move borrowers out 
of expensive adjustable-rate mortgages into fixed-rate loans. "We really 
believe we can help people caught in these bad mortgages," says Jean 
Pogge, executive vice president of consumer and community banking at 
ShoreBank. And with plenty of lenders having failed or pulled back from 
markets, new customers are flocking to their doors. "We're getting 
demand for regular co-op loans for the first time," says Levy of the 
Lower East Side Credit Union. In California, the news on housing may be 
unrelentingly grim, but through the third quarter, Clearinghouse CDFI 
made 161 loans for $48.4 million, up about 50 percent from the total in 
the first three quarters of 2007. Doug Bystry says, "This may be a 
record year for us."

A version of this article also appears in this week's Newsweek. Andrew 
Murr in Los Angeles and Hilary Shenfeld in Chicago assisted in the 
re****ting.
Daniel Gross is the Moneybox columnist for Slate and the business 
columnist for Newsweek. You can e-mail him at moneybox@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 He is 
the author of Pop! Why Bubbles Are Great for the Economy.

Article URL: http://www.slate.com/id/2204583/



Apparently, if you use good business principles and are not greedy, you 
can make money in the mortgage business and still get paid decently, 
too. Imagine that.
 




 14 Posts in Topic:
For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
Boater <payer33859@[EM  2008-11-15 07:48:51 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
"Eisboch" <r  2008-11-15 08:43:02 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
LoogyPicker@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-11-15 06:17:44 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
Jim <motza@[EMAIL PROT  2008-11-15 09:59:47 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
"Don White" <  2008-11-15 11:02:51 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
Jim <motza@[EMAIL PROT  2008-11-15 10:09:18 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
"Eisboch" <r  2008-11-15 11:21:42 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
Tom Francis - SWSports &l  2008-11-15 23:28:11 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
"Canuck57" <  2008-11-15 07:40:39 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
"Eisboch" <r  2008-11-15 11:38:11 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
"Canuck57" <  2008-11-15 10:27:24 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
"D.Duck" <Do  2008-11-15 17:10:39 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
"Canuck57" <  2008-11-15 16:01:48 
Re: For Dr. Eisboch, who might find this interesting
"Don White" <  2008-11-15 19:57:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 23:52:14 PST 2009.