Re: OT: Perspective of the Indian Muslim?

johnwesleyharding2000@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Dec 1, 4:33 pm, Brijesh <brijesh.khergam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Dec 1, 12:01 am, jzfredricks <jzfredri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 1, 5:53 pm, Jayen <rsc_pos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> Whilst things aren't perfect in the countries you cited, they are
>>>>> about 100 years ahead of India.
>>>> Except for the itsy-bitsy part about being in such a position because
>>>> of a
>>>> wholesale genocide of the people who are different which was carried
>>>> out,
>>>> in some cases, just a few decades ago.
>>> That is all too true, sadly.
>>> Yet somehow we are where we are today. How's that for progress?
>> You're still 100 years away from non Christian prime minister. We have
>> non hindu prime minister and a woman president . We had a muslim
>> president in 60s. Hows that for :we are 100 years ahead?
> 
> This "symbolism" thing used as an argument (done by supposedly serious
> journalists too) never fails to amaze me. Pakistan has had a women
> prime minister. 


It never fails to amaze you because you have very limited knowledge of 
politics, cultures among other things.



> Does it mean women enjoy a greater status over all
> (esp including rural areas) than in countries which never have had a
> women head of govt?
> 
> Same argument can be applied to India, where it is not that uncommon
> for Christian missionaries to suffer harassment, 


Which is perfectly justified.

If you go back in history, spreading ones religion is one of the top two 
reasons human beings massacred each other in millions.

If the western countries really believe in true secularism as opposed to 
the forked tongued secularism they practice, they would have banned 
marketing a religion a crime.

Christian missionaries should stop converting Indians to christianity 
and **** off from India.



> while some have been
> killed and nuns have been raped. 


Then stop converting hindus to christianity.

Why is it so difficult for you to understand ?

You already have so many christian countries in the world. Why do you 
want to convert the whole of India to christianity and destroy hinduism, 
  Sikhism and Jainism ?



> Now I don't know if Sweden has had a
> non Christian PM, but I am pretty sure Hindu priests, or for that
> matter, people of other non Christian religion don't suffer the same
> fate as minorities often do, say, in India.


Thats because hindu priests are not actively converting swedish 
christians to hinduism.



> Mind you, I am not defending one side against the other in this
> debate. Just pointing out the fallacy of this symbolism argument.


The fallacy is not in his argument. It is in your ignorant, illiterate
mind.

--
posted via www.usenetfast.com - Fastest downloads from $4.50/month !