Re: Hayden run out ...again !

On Dec 2, 8:12=A0pm, M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Dec 1, 9:53=A0pm, "Michael Banner" <mpban...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > <M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:ef2c4794-afaa-40d4-b882-59e6260028c0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Dec 1, 11:58 am, Michael Banner <mpban...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 30, 11:44 am, M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 30, 7:59 am, jzfredricks <jzfredri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Nov 30, 5:05 am, M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> > > > > > Katich had no right to say no. It was never his call.
>
> > > > > You can't say 'never'.
>
> > > > Yes, I can say never.
>
> > > **** me Moby.
>
> > "Meh. =A0I will say "never" to that! :-)"
>
> > I think that is the last thing we will agree on here! :-)
>
> Perhaps so in this thread.
>
> My opinion remains that, to take full advantage of any available runs,
> someone has to have the final say. =A0And, while there may be
> extenuating cir***stances to over-rule, none of these existed, in my
> opinion, in this case.
>
> Rule by committee is inefficient.
>
> Moby-

There wasn't a committee out there, Dave, only two blokes.

One of them made a bad call. Luckily, the only person who had to wear
the consequences of it was him

Higgs