On Dec 3, 1:37=A0pm, "tendulkar.com" <tendulkar....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2:09=A0pm, arahim <arahim_ara...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps Mr. Dickason would be good enough to detail what the
> > differences in the security arrangements were between what Pakistan
> > offered and what India has now so that next time around expectations
> > can be met:)
>
> Dude,
> =A0 You sound like a sore loser hitting on a chick, "But, you said you
> like Nice guys. Why wouldn't you go out with me?. I'm a nice guy"
>
> Do you really want England to come and say. "Sorry, it's not you,
> Its me" to make you feel better?.
>
> Here's Behavioral Psych 101,
> People will never ever speak their real minds to anyone except the
> internet. There are some chicks that you like and some chicks you
> don't. Certain places scare you and certain places do not. You can't
> have a table of Pros and Cons or a truth table to force yourself to
> lust for someone or tour a country. Either you tour or you don't. No
> need for explanations. The more you seek explanations the more lies
> you get. Nobody is going to tell you that "you are fat loser who suck
> in bed"
The point was that the reason here is financial. That is the
difference.
I guess you are advocating that discriminating on any basis is fine
just because that is what "I" want. In dating it is fine to say who
you would date or not even may be if you do it along racial lines but
it is not right to do it at work. Your analogy is not correct for what
is at hand.
|
