On Aug 26, 2:17=A0pm, Jim Mallon <El_Horn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Aug 26, 10:12=A0am, "Frankie" <billy_berrou(no_spam)@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > It didn't get hijacked.
>
> > I was able to get Todd to succinctly summarize what the thread was
real=
ly
> > about:
>
> > "I guess the roundabout point was that there should be some type of
> > league formed to give even old-timers more incentive to stick with the
> > s****t."
>
> > "Jim Mallon" <El_Horn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:570ad036-2e07-4305-a4f8-1c19bf9523c2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Aug 26, 9:36 am, joadnt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 26, 12:08 pm, MC <imattcl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > can't you guys have these discussions over email? or a cup of
coffe=
e
> > > > or something?
>
> > > yep, just like we can here ****face
>
> > It's an interesting topic of which I was hoping to hear some good
> > answers, and the damn thread got hijacked on the first reply.
>
> > How 'bout some people weigh in and discuss the original question?
>
> Well, I'd like to hear peoples' thoughts on what old-timers could
> still get it done if there were only 84 spots available. How many 35
> year olds? Any 40 year olds? Would they all be 'O' players. Who can
> still dominate on 'D'? You know, that kind of thing. Al Nichols was on
> fire at 2006 Nat'ls and he was 42. (I think.)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Zone - O.
Count me in.
|
