Even if you remove the absolute seeding, the format still makes it
more advantageous to be seeded second in your pool rather than first,
and fifth in your pool rather than fourth. I've just never seen a
format that rewarded lower seeds before, even though I have no problem
with it for the purposes of this tournament. If this were a series
event, then we would definitely have an issue.
On Aug 29, 11:23=A0am, Jackson <arieljack...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 6:53=A0pm, LaborDayUltim...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > GOAT isn't specifically the 4 seed and the Condors aren't necessarily
t=
he 15th,
> > that's just Score Re****t doing its job.
>
> I think there is an option when using the score re****ter to set up
> pools that removes the number seeding. Under the seeding option, if
> you select "pools", it will group the teams into the pools as desired,
> but will not assign a seed to each team. If I understand you
> correctly, this is what you are attempting to do.
|
